EFSS Participant's Evaluation Form

1) Quality of the event

How useful for your professional activity did you find this event? *

Not useful (1)

Fairly useful (2)

Useful (3)

Extremely useful (4)

If this activity was not useful, please explain why: *

What was your overall impression of this event? *

Very poor (1)

Poor (2)

Good (3)

Excellent (4)

What was the best aspect of this event? *

What was the worst aspect of this event? *

2) Relevance of the event

Did the event fulfil your educational goals and expected learning outcomes? *

Not at all (1)

Not much (2)

Somewhat (3)

Very much (4)

Was the presented information well balanced and consistently supported by a valid scientific evidence base? *

Not at all (1)

Not much (2)

Somewhat (3)

Very much (4)

How useful to you personally was each session? *

1st session's title: *

Not useful (1)

Fairly Useful (2)

Useful (3)

Extremely Useful (4)

2nd session's title: *

Not useful (1)

Fairly Useful (2)

Useful (3)

Extremely Useful (4)

3) Suitability of formats used during the event

Was there adequate time available for discussions, questions & answers and learner engagement? *

Never (1)

Only rarely (2)

Sometimes (3)

Always/Almost Always (4)

Can you indicate any innovative elements during the activity? *

4) Ways the event affects clinical practice

Will the information you learnt be implemented in your practice? *

Not at all (1)

Not much (2)

Somewhat (3)

Very much (4)

Can you provide ONE example how this event will influence your future practice? *

5) Commercial bias

Did all the faculty members provide their potential conflict of interest declaration with the sponsor(s) as a second slide of their presentation? *

No (1)

Yes, but only a small part (2)

Yes, for the majority (3)

Yes, all (4)

Can you provide an example of biased presentation in this activity? *

Do you agree that the information was overall free of commercial and other bias? *

Strongly disagree (1)

Rather disagree (2)

Rather agree (3)

Strongly agree (4)